Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 July 1

< June 30	July 2 >

July 1

File:Army Raiders.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by De728631 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Army Raiders.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

REUTERS/Beawiharta - according to metadata Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:57, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Oscar Mayer logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F2 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oscar Mayer logo.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Too complicated to be copyright-free as "text and simple geometric figures" since the y of Mayer becomes a box with round corners. There is a valid FUR. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:51, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:40, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Undelete the commons version has been nominated for deletion. If it's too complex to be free here, it would be as well on commons, so this should not have been deleted here for being on commons. Instead, we should have discussed whether this would be kept on EN.Wiki or not under NFCC; as this image has been used for a while on the Oscar Meyer article, I'd expect that some version of it was not empty. -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 04:18, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]